Situational Ethics & Moral Dilemmas
Situational ethics are the opposite of what Marianne
Jennings stated about ethics being part of a person's
character. There are many in business who would argue that
ethics depend on the situation. It is wrong to lie to your
wife but it is acceptable to lie to someone when attempting
to make a sale. Whether a person cheats on their spouse has
nothing to do with whether they would cheat in a business
deal. So, in a sense, this would be situational relativism.
Moral
Dilemmas are also studied in ethics and we face these every
day. A
moral dilemma is when
we are faced with two choices, both of which violate our
ethical standards. For example, we are faced with hiring a
relative who really needs a job and could be helped greatly
by some work experience and development of job skills, and
hiring the most qualified person. On the one hand, we
believe it is right to help our relatives and we should
treat our relatives better than other people. On the other
hand, we believe it is only fair to hire the most qualified
person. This particular moral dilemma is so common that we
have anti-nepotism rules to prevent it.
(Nepotism
-favoritism
shown toward one's relatives.)
In
our view, one of the failings on the reservation is the
lack of 'red tape'. Sounds crazy, we know. Nothing makes
John Q. Public's blood boil more than hearing some
heartless bureaucrat say, "Sorry, it's just our policy.
There's nothing I can do about it."
Consider this crazy idea for a minute, though. Maybe those
policies are why non-Indian agencies often function with
fewer problems. They have anti-nepotism policies AND THEY
STICK TO THESE POLICIES. Individual relativism does not
happen as often. The policies are not ignored if you are
from the right family. It is not that non-Indians are more
ethical, it is that they have a system in place with an
ethical basis and we often don't have any system. The rules
change depending on who your relatives and friends are.
Click
here to decide on a few moral dilemmas for yourself.