• Ethical Training Home
• Ethics: What and Why
• Theories of Ethics
  • Dallas for Council
  • Your view
  • Good for all
  • Sitting Bull Ethics
  • Whose Ethics?
  • Applied Ethics
  • Learn More Links
• Ethics in Indian Country
• Traditional Ethics
• Modern Indian Ethics
• SLC Research
• Myths of Ethical Change
• Moral Collapse
• The By-Stander
• Emotional Intelligence
• Joe Tribal Worker
• Susie Sainte
• Positive Ethics
• Action Plans

Dallas for Tribal Council

Dallas has been a tribal council member for almost thirty years. No one can argue that he has not done great things for the tribe. He used connections in Washington and with other tribes to bring in over $30 million in grant money. Dallas was the leader in gaining approval for a casino on the reservation, worked with contractors on the design and building. Now the tribe receives over $3 million each year in payments, money which is used for loans to tribal members to start small businesses and for early childhood programs. There is not a person on the reservation who has not benefitted directly from Dallas' work.

Dallas has a large family, nearly all of whom work for tribal organizations. While some are dedicated workers, the majority received jobs through his connections. They were often hired over tribal members who had more education and work experience. For example, his nineteen-year-old niece was hired as a grantwriter. His brother, who has a tenth-grade education, is the manager for a tribal program that employs 50 people. His previous position was janitor at the elementary school. Several of his relatives only show up for work two or three days a week, but draw a full salary. On rare occasions, there has been a manager who has had the nerve to fire one of Dallas's relatives. If that manager does not have political connections of their own, such as a relative on the tribal council, Dallas has always gotten the firing overturned and usually had some negative letter put in the manager's personnel file, if not had the person outright fired. If that fails, no matter. Even if the relative has missed 90 days of work in the past year, been driving a tribal car under the influence, or missed work many times, spending the days in a bar, that person will have a new tribal job within the week.

Now there is a movement to elect a younger person to office to replace Dallas. Those supporting his opponent say that it is time for ethics, for fair hiring, for good service and good role models. Dallas' supporters argue that he is good for the tribe. A little nepotism - and they argue, correctly, that he is not the only one - is nothing compared to the millions of dollars, the early childhood programs, the economic development programs, the jobs that he has brought in. Would you really hurt every member of the tribe just so 20 or 30 worthless tribal employees could be replaced with good people? There isn't any guarantee those jobs wouldn't just go to relatives of other tribal members.

Would you vote to keep Dallas in office? Or to remove him? What if you knew your job was one that would probably go, because your program was funded through money brought in by Dallas's connections? Click here to send us your view.